BREEDING CONDITIONS REPORT, 2003


RESPONDENT

Joseph Liebezeit

SITE NAME

Kuparuk Oilfield, USA

Contact details (phone/fax//e-mail//address):
503-241-7231/503-241-7925(fax) // jliebezeit@wcs.org // Wildlife Conservation Society, North America Program - Pacific West office, 718 SW Alder Street, Suite 210, Portland, OR 97205, USA

PROJECT DETAILS

Project name:

Nest survival of tundra-nesting birds and human development on the North Slope of Alaska

Start of survey:

End of survey: Team size:

8.06

25.07

4


WEATHER CONDITIONS

Season phenology: late

Weather conditions:

Upon arrival on 2.06, snow cover in the flat areas was roughly 25-35% (noticeably more than 2002). The second week of June was particularly cold (near or just below 0øC). July was warmer than June with only one major rainstorm on 3 July.

 

Season temperature: cold
Season humidity:
Date of 50% snow-cover: 20-30.05
Date of ice-break on rivers: 2.06
Date of final loss of snow: 16.06

BIOTIC CONDITIONS

Rodents abundance evaluation:

low

Breeding conditions:

Mean nest initiation dates were later in 2003 than in 2002. For two species, Lapland Bunting and Greater White-fronted Goose, this trend was significant - possibly the result of the later snowmelt during the 2003 season.
We discovered and monitored all nests on 24 10-hectare study plots every 3-6 days until nesting fate was determined. We discovered 223 nests of 17 species from 8 June to 25 July. Nests of Lapland Bunting, Pectoral Sandpiper, Semipalmated Sandpiper, and Greater White-fronted Goose accounted for the majority (75%) of those found. Of the 223 nests, 65 were discovered off-plot. One hundred thirty-one nests successfully hatched, 74 failed, and we were unable to reliably assess the fate of 18 nests. Most nests failed due to predation (67 of 74 nests, 91%). Other causes of nest failure included: human-induced (n=5) and infertile eggs (n=3). Mayfield estimates of nesting success for the three most common species were: Lapland Bunting (n=58): 0.466, Pectoral Sandpiper (n=28): 0.379, and Semipalmated Sandpiper (n=19): 1.0.
We conducted three 10-minute point count surveys for potential nest predators on all plots. We conducted a total of 3 replicates of this survey on all plots during the course of the season. A total of 7 potential predators were detected (number of detections in brackets): Peregrine Falcon (n=1), Common Raven (n=4), Arctic Fox (n=5), Pomarine Skua (n=2), Arctic Skua (n=70), and Long-tailed Skua (n=42), Glaucous Gull (n>100). The most common potential predators were Glaucous Gull, Arctic and Long-tailed Skuas, while Arctic Foxes and Ravens were much less abundant.
Overall nest densities were similar at this site between years (64.6 nests/km2 in 2003, 60.4 nests/ km2 in 2002). However, there were considerable fluctuations in nest density among some of the species between years. A slightly higher percentage of nests were successful in 2003 versus 2002, but these differences (per species) were rarely significantly different in terms of daily survival rate. Predation was the most important cause of nest failure in both years. The same potential nest predators in relatively the same proportions were recorded in both years.
 

Rodent dynamics:

All 4 observers over 2 months in the field only observed lemmings a few times. No trend in lemming abundance was apparent during the course of the season. We did not capture lemmings.

Rodent species recorded:

LatinAbundance

Summary of fauna studies:

 

FAUNA IN STUDY AREA

Group of speciesPresenceAbundanceBreedingDetailed studiesComment
arctic foxesYescommonbreedingYes 
lemmingsYesrare   
wadersYesabundanthatchingYes 
swansYescommonbreeding  
geeseYesabundanthatchingYes 
ducksYescommonhatchingYes 
birds of preyYesrare   
buzzardsYesrare   
ptarmigansYescommonhatchingYes 
skuasYesabundantbreedingYes 
pomarine skuasYesrare Yes 
gulls/ternsYesabundantbreedingYes 
owlsYesrare Yes 
passerinesYesabundantfledgingYes 
diversYescommonbreedingYes 
ground squirrelsYesrare   

 

SEABIRD COLONIES

speciesComment

 

WATERBIRD NON-BREEDING AGGREGATIONS

speciesAggregation typeNumberComment
Anser albifronsroost,feed 80-100

 

HUMAN ACTIVITY IN THE STUDY AREA

Human activityComment
area affected by industrial development 

 


Recommended citation

Liebezeit, J.R. (2003). Breeding conditions report for Kuparuk Oilfield, USA, 2003. ARCTIC BIRDS: an international breeding conditions survey. (Online database). Eds. M.Soloviev, P.Tomkovich. . Updated 11 Dec. 2008. Accessed .

 See also

Alaska Shorebird Group 2004. Summaries of ongoing or new studies of Alaska shorebirds during 2003. March 2004.

 more on citation guidelines

 

HOME PAGE